| |
What
exactly is 'mentored-learning' anyway?
There are many different types of online education courses. They
range from downloadable self-paced courses to real-time, instructor-led
courses. And while most people can understand each end of this spectrum,
it is in the middle ground where most of the confusion lies.
The middle ground is loosely called 'mentored-learning'. Today,
over 66% of online educational institutions offer some form of mentored-learning.
Unfortunately, nobody knows what it means. 'Mentored-learning' can
mean anything from sending a student a couple of emails to diligently
monitoring a student's progress twenty-four hours a day, seven days
a week. For the prospective student, trying to understand what you're
getting is a formidable task.
The rest of this article describes what we mean by mentored-learning.
It also provides you with some questions that you can ask eLearning
companies to help you understand what they mean by mentored-learning.
In our model, mentored-learning plays a key role in the overall
learning experience. We couple self-paced reading materials and
practical assignments with several kinds of communications such
as student-to-instructor email, student-to-student email, real-time
classroom chat, and bulletin board discussion groups. This means
that throughout the course, students are performing one of four
operations:
In our courses, students spend their time reading and interacting
with the course content. This means reading though a series of lesson
modules and taking quizzes to prepare themselves for the practical
assignments. This is very much like traditional studying. For this,
students typically choose to use the CD-ROM that they receive so
that they don't tie up their phone line or have to endure Internet
delays (though they are welcome to use the online version if they
wish).
Throughout their studies, students work with course software, researching,
creating, assembling and submitting assignments. This will be a
combination of resources on their machine and from the server.
For the duration of the course, students will work with other students
via email, via chat and via discussion groups to either discuss
topics or complete group assignments.
The phrase 'instructor-mentored' means students are being monitored
and guided through these activities by a course instructor, course
markers and/or visiting experts. It has three linked forms.
Email exchanges: Either instructors or students can initiate
Email exchanges. Success is measured by the speed of the response.
We try for 'inside 24' - response times of less than 24 hours. Instructors
respond at best speed, often within minutes, and we notify students
of the times during the day when they can expect more immediate
responses. Circumstances dictate that there may be some delays,
but these do not exceed 48 hours. In return, we expect students
to check their email and to participate in course activities at
regular intervals.
Discussion groups: Discussion groups in which students take
leadership on specific topics of their experience or issues of importance
to them in their studies. Here too our instructors are involved,
comment, support and link users. We provide answers, but we also
listen and promote student-based initiatives, ideas and models.
Marking: We mark assignments closely, electronically, with
comments linked inside the student materials themselves so readers
see exactly where work can be improved, corrected and - most important
- how this can be achieved. The comments deal directly with the
work at each stage and then link the stages together in summary
comments, with a grade, at the conclusion of the assignment. That
is mentored-learning.
Good question. Not all eLearning companies share our view of 'mentored
learning'. So when it comes to your education, you'll want to make
sure that you know what you're buying. So how can you know if you
are sentenced to email limbo? It's tough, but here are some questions
you might want to ask and things you might want to do:
Any reputable eLearning site will have a list of student testimonials
on their courses. If they don't, don't take their courses. We list
our student testimonials on each of the course description pages
and on a separate testimonials
page. We're extremely proud of what people have to say about our
courses. For example, here is what Judy Ferril of Positive Solutions,
Inc. recently had to say about one of our instructors:
"I am currently enrolled in your Professional XML Authoring Course
with Susan Bodnik as my instructor. It is a very challenging course,
but I am enjoying it. I feel as if I am on my way to developing
a good skill set. One thing that impressed me about online-learning.com
is if I have a question (even before enrolling), there is always
a quick response. This is critical when distance is involved.
Susan is very good about getting me through difficult issues and
keeping in touch with the class."
Just because a course is online, doesn't mean it has to be 'instructorless'.
We insist on putting our instructor's names and bios on each course
for two reasons. First, we believe it is more credible for you as
a consumer so obviously it helps us 'promote' our courses. Second,
we believe it is important for our instructors to take ownership
and pride in the courses they mentor.
At the risk of being deluged in email, if you're really interested
in a particular course and have some questions, try sending the
company an email and ask for the specific instructor to answer it.
Then see how many hours, days, weeks, months, or years it takes
them to respond.
Again, any reputable eLearning site will outline who is associated
with the company. They should also be able to tell you what role
those people play in developing and reviewing course materials.
Our instructors average about two hours marking a six-page assignment.
Obviously this number will vary greatly depending upon the quality
of the assignment. Weak assignments can take three to four times
as long to mark than an 'A' paper that is clear, concise and error-free.
But it is this extended attention to detail and marking that makes
the difference between good and bad mentoring. A thoroughly marked
assignment, with links to the problem areas and their resolution
can do more than whole other courses where you receive a grade and
a comment like 'poorly expressed.' Instructors will often exchange
emails with students because marking comments generate additional
discussion. And the subsequent revisions usually produce a work
well above anything the student has ever done before.
To be honest, the number of hours for student support varies greatly.
Some students require extensive support -- several emails per day
and lots of advice throughout the assignments. It is typically heaviest
at the start of the course when everything is new - the technology,
the course content, our expectations, the other class members, their
expectations (and reliability), determining the 'tempo', how long
things take to accomplish, how complete and thorough they have to
be. Other surges occur in the days before assignment submissions
and around any processes involving more than one classmate. Each
new piece of software has its own demands and surprises. Scheduling
our resources to meet these expeditiously and with patience is probably
the hardest task from the instructor's point of view. Again, we
feel the testimonials speak for themselves.
We allocate up to 8 hours per student per course for personalized
help, communications, marking and administration. These numbers
can be increased, if necessary, but they seldom fall below that
average across the members of a class. We also encourage students
to work together, sharing their materials and results, commenting
and advising on work in progress, pointing out options and additional
resources and we post these results to the entire class, noting
who has helped and how. This open exchange bears large results in
trust, good will and respect among classmates, and it provides a
significant part of personal support and information in every class.
The advantage is that we don't place any limit on the support that
a student requests. So those who need the extra guidance are able
to receive the help they need.
Depending upon which report you read, eLearning drop out rates range
from 65% to 80%. For example, Forrester Research claims that eLearning
suffers from student drop out rates as high as 80%. At online-learning.com,
our rate is between 15% and 20% depending upon the course. We're
extremely proud of this fact. We feel it is a reflection of our
mentored-learning model and, to be frank, the fact that we employ
instructors who care about their students. If you think about it,
our drop out rate is actually better than most major universities
and high schools across Canada or the United States. Again, there
are numerous studies, but the British Broadcasting Corporation puts
the United States' university drop out rates at 37%.
Like it or not, education today is about preparing students for
jobs. So the mark of a good course would be its placement rate.
At online-learning.com, many of our students are already employed
before they take our courses. They come to our courses to refresh
or upgrade their skills. As a result, it is impossible for us to
make the claim that our mentored-process gets people jobs. It does
however lend credence to the fact that our courses are perceived
to be credible by industry professionals and their employers.
Online education is often touted as the future of learning. As we
approach this future, we believe that it will be the learning models
that will decide the fate of most online schools. The educational
institutions that implement the best models will reap the highest
rewards.
We believe that mentored-learning offers the right balance between
self-paced courses and classroom-based courses. It offers students
a personalized learning experience. It allows them to learn at their
own speed, at their level and at their convenience. And it ensures
that they have access to an experienced instructor who can guide
them through the learning process. Our model was built on these
beliefs, and it is these beliefs that will lead us into the future.
Doug Talbott is the vice president of eContent at online-learning.com.
He comes to online-learning.com from Nortel Networks' Design Interpretive
Group where he directed a wide range of user interface design, human
factors engineering and technical documentation projects. Prior
to joining Nortel, Doug ran an Ottawa-based design and communications
consultancy that won numerous awards across Canada and the United
States. In addition, Doug was a member of the three-person management
team that created and operated the Honeywell Institute. The Institute
invented and introduced the concept of immersive training by offering
intensive four-month training programs in systems design and computer
programming. He has designed and taught courses throughout his career
at the Institute, as a private consultant, and at Nortel and for
Carleton University in the areas of computer programming, human
computer interaction and visual interaction design.
© 2002 Online-learning.com
|